
Testing a visual language built from small signals: time, temperature, and weather. Familiar, useful, and quietly computational.

Testing a visual language built from small signals: time, temperature, and weather. Familiar, useful, and quietly computational.
Most TV interfaces treat browsing like a flat shelf: move left, move right, repeat.
A spatial gallery suggests another possibility. What if shows lived in a navigable field, with depth helping communicate proximity, category, or relevance? The interesting part is not the 3D effect. It is whether a remote could move through that field predictably without losing orientation, focus, or a clear way back.
I am not ready to build it yet. I want to leave the question here so I can return later and ask whether spatial browsing can make television discovery feel more alive without making it harder to use.